Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD 2013 01186
Original file (PD 2013 01186.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX CASE: PD-2013-01186
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army BOARD DATE: 201 4 0911
Separation Date: 20020620


SUMMARY OF CASE : Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SGT/E-5 (92G/Food Service Sergeant) medically separated for back, shoulder, hip and neck conditions. These four conditions could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty ( MOS) or satisfy physical fitness standards. He was issued a permanent U3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The back, shoulder, hip and neck conditions, characterized as “chronic neck pain w/DDD diffusely of the cervical spine and loss of forward flexion,” “chronic low back pain, mechanical in nature w/o evidence of radiculopathy,” “left shoulder, mild pain; status post previous arthroscopic sub-acromial decompression” and “chronic right hip pain” were the only conditions forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. The Informal PEB combined three of the four conditions and adjudicated the “pain lower back, left shoulder and right hip” as well as “chronic neck pain w/DDD” as unfitting, rated at 10% and 10% for a combined disability rating of 20% respectively, with likely application of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy and the Veteran’s Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


 CI CONTENTION : The CI writes: “DOD erred in combining the rating for Pain in lower Back, Left shoulder, and Right hip on the DA Form 199. Each unfitting condition should have been separated and provided a rating per DODI 1332.39, November 14. 1996 6.4; 6.10: 6.14. Additionally Range of Motion measurements were not taken IAW directives, using a Goniometer and were therefore an estimation of the examiner. USMC records were not reviewed by board.”


SCOPE OF REVIEW : The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The ratings for the unfitting back, shoulder, hip and neck conditions are addressed below and, no additional conditions are within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records.

The Board acknowledges the CI’s assertions that his disability disposition was not conducted within the DoDI quoted. It is noted for the record that the Board has no jurisdiction to investigate or render opinions in reference to such allegations and, redress in excess of the Board’s scope of recommendations (as noted above) must be addressed by the Board for the Correction of Military Records and/or the United States judiciary system.


RATING COMPARISON :
invalid font number 31502
Service IPEB – Dated 20020306
 VA - (Same Month As Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Pain Lower Back, Left Shoulder, and Right Hip 5099-5003 10% Degenerative Disc Disease (DDD) of the Lumbar Spine 5292 10% 20020606
Residuals of Left Shoulder Surgery 5201 0% 20020606
Right Hip Pain 5252 Not Service Connected (NSC) 20020606
Chronic Neck Pain 5290 10% DDD of the Neck 5290 10% 20020606
No Other Items in Scope
 No Others Items in Scope
Combined: 20%
 Combined: 20%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 20020801 ( most proxi mate to date of separation )


ANALYSIS SUMMARY : The PEB combined the pain lower back, left shoulder, right hip conditions under a single disability rating, coded analogously to 5003 a rthritis, degenerative (hypertrophic or osteoarthritis) code. This coding approach is countenanced by AR 635-40 (B.24 f.), but IAW DoDI 6040.44 the Board must apply only VASRD guidance to its recommendation. The Board must t her efore apply separate codes and ratings in its recommendations if compensable ratings for each joint are achieved IAW VASRD §4.71a. If the Board judges that two or more separate ratings are warranted in such cases, however, it must satisfy the requirement that each “unbundled” condition was “reasonably justified” as separately unfitting.

 Pain Lower Back, Left Shoulder, and Right Hip Conditions : The Board first considered if the pain lower back, left shoulder, and right hip conditions having been de-coupled from the combined PEB adjudication, remained independently unfitting as established above. Prior to entry into the disability evaluation process, the CI had multiple temporary profiles that document h is neck, low back and left shoulder conditions caused duty limitations, while no profiles implicated the right hip in any duty limitation. T h ere are numerous service treatment record (STR) notes that document evaluation and treatment of h is lower back and left shoulder pain both separately and individually. The right hip is only mentioned in MEB exam and the VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam. Th ere are no oth er records in the STR that document right hip pain. The commander’s statement documented that the restrictions listed in the CI’s profile affected his ability to deploy to field training exercises and perform in his MOS and did not mention any specific condition. The well-established principle for fitness determinations is that they are performance-based. The Board could not find evidence in the commander’s statement or elsewhere i n the STR that documented any significant interference of the right hip condition with the performance of duties at the time of separation. After due deliberation, all Board members agreed that the evidence does not support a conclusion that the functional impairment from the right hip condition was integral to the CI ’s inability to perform his MOS and, accordingly cannot recommend a separate rating for it. Additionally, members agreed that the chronic low back pain and left shoulder pain conditions, as isolated conditions, would have rendered the CI incapable of c ontinued service within his MOS and t her efore each is separately unfitting and merits a separate rating.

Pain Lower Back Condition . The CI had an episodic history of low back pain from overuse and overwork until he sustained a fall at work in 1998, which exacerbated his pain. A sacroiliac joint (SIJ) X -ray done for a 6 - month history of chronic low back pain (LBP) was normal. The commander’s statement documented that the restrictions listed in the CI’s profile affected his ability to deploy to field training exercises and perform in his MOS and did not mention any specific condition. The CI was referred to physical therapy (PT) for chronic LBP evaluation and treatment. The CI was given a permanent U3 Profile for chronic neck and shoulder pain with restrictions specific to the medical conditions. He continued to report chronic LBP despite a variety of treatment modalities. A lumbar spine X -ray showed a moderate degree of arthritic changes at the L1 - 2 and L3 - 4 joint spaces. The MEB narrative summary (NARSUM) exam approximately 5 months prior to separation documented that the CI had LBP rated at 4-5/10 which increased with activities . The VA C&P exam ( 15 days prior to separation ) documented that the CI had chronic LBP . The NARSUM and C&P physical exam findings are summarized in the chart below:

There were two range -of- motion (ROM) evaluations in evidence, with documentation of additional ratable criteria, which the Board considered in arriving at its rating recommendation; as summarized in the chart below:

Thoracolumbar ROM (Degrees) MEB ~ 5 Mo s . Pre-Sep VA C&P 15 Days Pre Sep
Flexion (90 Normal) 90 70
Combined (240) - -
Comment Pos. painful motion; Normal reflexes Pos. right straight leg raise; Normal reflexes
§4.71a Rating 10 % 10 %
invalid font number 31502
invalid font number 31502 The 2002 VASRD coding and rating standards for the spine, which must be applied to the Board’s recommendation IAW DoDI 6040.44, differ significantly from the current §4.71a general rating formula for the spine. The earlier criteria were subject to the rater’s opinion regarding degree of severity, as opposed to the more objective current standards with quantifiable rating thresholds grounded in ROM measurements. The 2002 criteria relevant for consideration in the Board’s recommendation are cited in context below. invalid font number 31502
invalid font number 31502
5292 Spine, limitation of motion of, lumbar
Severe .......................................................40
Moderate ..................................................20
Slight .........................................................10

The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB coded the pain, low er back condition as 5099 analogous to 5003 and rated at 10% with application of the USAPDA pain policy. The VA coded the DDD of the lumbar spine condi tion as 5292 , limitation of lumbar spine motion and rated at 10 %. The Board considered the coding of 5295 lumbosacral strain and a 10% rating ( with characteristic pain on motion ) versus a 20% rating ( with muscle spasm on extreme forward bending, loss of lateral spine motion, unilateral, in standing' position ) , however no examination documented muscle spasm or loss of lateral spine motion. The Board deduced that the VA C&P exam was as thorough as the MEB exam however this exam was 15 days prior to separation and therefore had the highest probative value. The Board agreed that the evidence above more closely aligned with application of code 5292, limitation of lumbar spine motion, as there was limited ROM on the VA C &P exam. T h ere is no reasonable coding or rating scheme that would result in a rating greater rating than 10%. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board recommends a disability rating of 10% for the c hronic lo w back pain condition .

Pain Left Shoulder Condition. The CI was seen for left shoulder pain with periods of locking , catching and popping which w ere made worse by lifting. There were physical findings of localized pain and crepitus. The CI was evaluated by PT for the left shoulder pain an d was diagnosed with left shoulder impingement syndrome while an o rthopedist diagnosed left shoulder impingement syndrome with a possible labral tear. The CI underwent extensive PT for left shoulder pain. The CI underwent a left shoulder acromial decompression for progressive impingement with an AC joint arthr itis on 18 May 2001 . Two left shoulder X -rays done in both December 2001 and June 2002 were normal. The commander’s statement documented that the restrictions listed in the CI’s Profile affected his ability to deploy to field training exercises and perform in his MOS and did not mention any specific condition. The MEB N ARSUM exam documented that the CI had occasional pain with excessive overhead activities and doing pushups . The VA C&P exam documented that the CI occasionally still had clicking and a catch in the surgical area. The MEB NARSUM and C &P physical exam findings are summarized in the chart below.

There were two ROM evaluations in evidence, with documentation of additional ratable criteria, which the Board considered in arriving at its rating recommendation; as summarized in the chart below:

Left Shoulder ROM (Degrees) MEB ~5 Mos. Pre-Sep VA C&P 15 days Pre Sep
Flexion (180 Normal) FROM 170
Abduction (180) 170
Comments : Right hand dominant Mild tenderness to palpation; Normal strength; P ain with overhead activities, pushups Chronic pain; cannot wear Kevlar, cannot carry a pack
§4.71a Rating 10% 10% (Based on §4.40, Functional loss)
invalid font number 31502
invalid font number 31502 The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 The PEB invalid font number 31502 coded the invalid font number 31502 left invalid font number 31502 shoulder invalid font number 31502 pain invalid font number 31502 condition invalid font number 31502 as 5099 analogous invalid font number 31502 to 5003 and rated at 10% with application of the USAPDA pain policy. invalid font number 31502 The VA coded the invalid font number 31502 residuals of left shoulder surgery invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 condition as 5201 invalid font number 31502 , invalid font number 31502 limitation of invalid font number 31502 arm invalid font number 31502 motion invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 and rated at invalid font number 31502 0% invalid font number 31502 , citing “…no tenderness on range of motion. ” invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 No exam indicated instability invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 or limited ROM to a compensable level invalid font number 31502 . invalid font number 31502 VASRD §4.71a specifies for 5003 that satisfactory evidence of painful motion limitation of motion and specifies a 10% rating for each major joint or group of minor joints affected by limitation of motion. invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 While the NARSUM provided satisfactory evidence of painful motion, the C&P exam did not. However, the C&P exam did document functional loss IAW VASRD §4.40 (Functional Loss) which the Board considered in arriving at its recommendation. invalid font number 31502 After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt) invalid font number 31502 and §4.40 invalid font number 31502 , the Board recommends a disability rating of invalid font number 31502 10 invalid font number 31502 % for invalid font number 31502 the left shoulder invalid font number 31502 pain invalid font number 31502 condition invalid font number 31502 . invalid font number 31502
invalid font number 31502
invalid font number 31502 Chronic invalid font number 31502 Neck invalid font number 31502 Pain invalid font number 31502 Condition. invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 The CI developed neck pain after a fall in 1998. He was seen in PT for chronic neck pain with physical exam invalid font number 31502 findings invalid font number 31502 of moderate limited ROM, grip weakness, t invalid font number 31502 riceps weakness and a positive invalid font number 31502 test for invalid font number 31502 nerve root compression at the cervical level. invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 A cervical spine MRI showed degenerative disc changes at C5-7 invalid font number 31502 with invalid font number 31502 minimal diffuse disc bulg invalid font number 31502 es invalid font number 31502 at C3-4 invalid font number 31502 and invalid font number 31502 bilateral invalid font number 31502 narrowing of the nerve root openings. invalid font number 31502 The CI continued with PT invalid font number 31502 and TENS unit invalid font number 31502 treatment throughout 2001 and 2002 with invalid font number 31502 out resolution of his pain invalid font number 31502 . invalid font number 31502 The commander’s statement documented invalid font number 31502 that the restrictions listed in the CI’s Profile affected his ability to deploy to field training exercises and perform in his MOS and did not mention any specific condition. invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 A invalid font number 31502 plain film invalid font number 31502 cervical spine invalid font number 31502 X invalid font number 31502 -ray invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 showed a moderate degree of arthritic changes involving C4-6 invalid font number 31502 . invalid font number 31502 The invalid font number 31502 MEB NARSUM exam documented that the CI had invalid font number 31502 stiff, constant neck pain that was rated at invalid font number 31502 5-6/10 invalid font number 31502 . invalid font number 31502 The VA C&P exam documented that the CI invalid font number 31502 had chronic neck pain and was unable to wear Kevlar nor could he carry a invalid font number 31502 pack. invalid font number 31502 The invalid font number 31502 NARSUM and invalid font number 31502 VA C invalid font number 31502 &P physical exam findings are summarized in the chart invalid font number 31502 below.
There were two ROM evaluations in evidence, with documentation of additional ratable criteria, which the Board considered in arriving at its rating recommendation; as summarized in the chart below:
Cervical ROM (Degrees) MEB ~5 Mo s . Pre-Sep VA C&P 15 Days Pre Sep
Flex (45 Normal) 15 10
Combined (340) - -
Comment No painful motion; Normal strength, reflexes & sensation; No evidence of radiculopathy Pos. tenderness; “Slight“ decreased ROM; “Moderate physical impairment”
§4.71a Rating 10 % 10 %
invalid font number 31502
invalid font number 31502 The 2002 VASRD coding and rating standards for the spine, which must be applied to the Board’s recommendation IAW DoDI 6040.44, differ significantly from the current §4.71a general rating formula for the spine. The earlier criteria were subject to the rater’s opinion regarding degree of severity, as opposed to the more objective current standards with quantifiable rating thresholds grounded in ROM measurements. The 2002 criteria relevant for invalid font number 31502 consideration in the Board’s recommendation are cited in context below. invalid font number 31502
invalid font number 31502
5290 Spine, limitation of motion of, cervical:
Severe.....................................................30
Moderate................................................20
Slight....................................................... 1 0

 The Board directs attenti on to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence . The PEB coded the chronic neck pain condition as 5290 , limitation of cervical spine motion and rated at 10% with application of the USAPDA pain policy . The VA coded the DDD of the nec k condition as 5290 and rated at 10% , “s light. ” The Board deduced that the VA C&P exam was as thorough as the MEB exam ; however , the C&P exam was 15 days prior to separation and therefore had the highest probative value. The Board agreed that the evidence above more closely aligned with application of code 529 0 , limitation of cervical spine motion, as there was limited ROM on the VA C &P exam . The Board considered the 10% , “s light ” rating versus the 20%, “moderate” rating . The C&P examiner designated the limitation of motion as “slight.” After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board recommends a disability rating of 10% for the chronic neck pain condition .


 BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. As discussed above, PEB reliance on the USAPDA pain policy ( 635-40) for rating the bundled low back pain , left shoulder pain and right hip conditions was operant in this case and th os e condition s w ere adjudicated separately and independently of that policy by the Board. In the matter of the right hip pain condition, the Board unanimously agrees that it was not separately unfitting and therefore cannot recommend it for a disability rating. In the matter of the low back pain condition, the Board unanimously agrees that it was separately unfitting and unanimously rec ommends a disability rating of 1 0%, coded 529 2 IAW VASRD §4.71a. In the matter of the pain left shoulder c ondition, the Board unanimously agrees that it was separately unfitting and unanimously recommends a disability rating of 10%, coded 5099-5003 IAW VASRD §4.71a. In the matter of the chronic neck pain condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 10% , coded under 5290 IAW VASRD §4.71a. T h ere were no ot h er conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


 RECOMMENDATION The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows and that the discharge with severance pay recharacterized to reflect permanent disability retirement, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation:

UNFITTING CONDITION S VASRD CODE RATING
Low Back Pain 5292 1 0%
Left Shoulder Pain 5099-5003 10%
Chronic Neck Pain 5290 10%
COMBINED 3 0%
invalid font number 31502
invalid font number 31502


The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20 1330827 , w/atchs
Exhib it B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans ’ Affairs Treatment Record






XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
Physical Disability Board of Review

SAMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation
for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, AR20140021527 (PD201301186)


1. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554(a), I approve the enclosed recommendation of the Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) pertaining to the individual named in the subject line above to recharacterize the individual’s separation as a permanent disability retirement with the combined disability rating of 30% effective the date of the individual’s original medical separation for disability with severance pay.

2. I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum:

         a. Providing a correction to the individual’s separation document showing that the individual was separated by reason of permanent disability retirement effective the date of the original medical separation for disability with severance pay.

         b. Providing orders showing that the individual was retired with permanent disability effective the date of the original medical separation for disability with severance pay.

         c. Adjusting pay and allowances accordingly. Pay and allowance adjustment will account for recoupment of severance pay, and payment of permanent retired pay at 30% effective the date of the original medical separation for disability with severance pay.

         d. Affording the individual the opportunity to elect Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) and medical TRICARE retiree options.

3. I request that a copy of the corrections and any related correspondence be provided to the individual concerned, counsel (if any), any Members of Congress who have shown interest, and to the Army Review Boards Agency with a copy of this memorandum without enclosures.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Encl                                                  XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                                                      Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
                                                      (Review Boards)
                                                     
CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD 2013 00937

    Original file (PD 2013 00937.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s role is thus confined to the review of medical records and all evidence at hand to assess the fairness of PEB rating determinations, compared to VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards, based on ratable severity at the time of separation; and, to review those fitness determinations within its scope (as elaborated above) consistent with performance-based criteria in evidence at separation. Neck Pain Condition . The single voter for dissent did not elect to submit a...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 01246

    Original file (PD2013 01246.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The PEB adjudicated “right, dominant, shoulder pain… ,” “right hip pain,” and “bilateral heel pain and right ankle pain” as unfitting, rated 10%, 0% and 0% (respectively), citing criteria of the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). Post-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Right Shoulder Pain…5099-500310%Right Shoulder Arthritis5010-520110%20091125Right Hip Pain…5099-50030%Right Hip Bursitis5024-525210%Bilateral Heel Pain and Right Ankle Pain…52840%Stress Fracture,...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02524

    Original file (PD-2013-02524.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam approximately 6.5 months after separation documented that the CI had constant daily neck pain rated at 7/10, neck stiffness occurred with turning the neck to any side with radiation down both upper extremities with feelings of hand weakness during an acute exacerbation. invalid font number 31502 RECOMMENDATION : The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows; and, that the discharge with severance pay be...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01693

    Original file (PD-2014-01693.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    invalid font number 31502 Service IPEB – Dated 20060316VA - (3 Mos. Chronic Upper Back Pain Condition . The CI was seen in pain managementprior to deploying for pain medications due to the chronic clavicle and shoulder pain.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01553

    Original file (PD-2013-01553.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The back and left shoulder conditions, characterized as “left shoulder rotator cuff tear, status post(s/p) repair and back pain secondary to T12 compression fracture” were forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01533

    Original file (PD-2013-01533.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Informal PEB adjudicated “TBI with residual neck pain and headaches;” “low back pain (LBP);” and “left knee pain with degenerative joint disease (DJD),” as unfitting, rated at 10%, 10%, and 0% respectively, with application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The Board could not find evidence in the commander’s statement or elsewhere in the treatment record that documented any significant interference of the neck pain condition with the performance of...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 01924

    Original file (PD 2014 01924.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    invalid font number 31502 Service IPEB – Dated 20080711VA - based on Service Treatment Records (STR)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Lumbar DDD523710%Lumbar DDD with Radiculopathy524220%STROther X 0 (Not in Scope)Other x1 Combined: 10%Combined: 30%Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 20090124 (most proximate to date of separation [DOS]) ANALYSIS SUMMARY :IAW DoDI 6040.44, the Board’s authority is limited to making recommendations on correcting disability determinations. A...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00182

    Original file (PD-2014-00182.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The VA’s decision was based on the fact that the CI had no medical treatment and therewas no diagnosed neck condition while on active duty or that this condition was due to active duty service.The Board’s main charge...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00161

    Original file (PD2013 00161.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The ratings for the unfitting neck and back conditions are addressed below. The PT note on 16March 2007, 3 months prior to separation recorded bubble inclinometer ROM without specification of the method used, or normal values, at flexion 21 degrees, and extension 9 degrees with pain.The MEB NARSUM exam on 23 April 2007, approximately2 months prior to separation, documented that the CI’s LBP symptoms had slowly worsened and that he had undergone rest, activity modification, anti-inflammatory...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01525

    Original file (PD-2014-01525.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The CI was given a permanent U3 profile for cervical degenerative disease (neck pain) and another medical condition, with a Code C and specific restrictions noted on the profile.The VA C&P exam approximately 2 months prior to separation documented that the CI reported...